Young Goodman Brown :: Free Essay Writer

'Young Goodman Brown'; was an interesting story because of its setting, characters, and plot. The story was set in the late Puritan Era when people were scared of the woods due to the mysterious witches and savage Indians. Puritans really liked true colors such as white and red. If white was worn it meant pure but if red was worn it meant evil. As Puritans, an individual had to have pure thoughts, and sex was only thought of to procreate if married.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚     Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Young Goodman Brown, Faith, fellow traveler, and the townspeople are the characters in 'Young Goodman Brown.'; Young Goodman Brown means an inexperienced good standing citizen with an ordinary last name. All he wanted was to advance in his social and religion status. His wife, Faith, is a sweet girl who wants her husband to stay home all the time. She wore pink ribbons in her hair, which in the Puritan Era pink resembled pollution. Pink is a mixture of white and red which was not a true color. Today in society pink means innocence, which is ironic from the Puritan way. The fellow traveler could have been either Young Goodman Brown's own personal devil or his father. The townspeople were church going people yet in the end they contradicted their own values and beliefs.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The plot of 'Young Goodman Brown'; had a lot of twists and turns. The story started out with Young Goodman Brown needing to go to an important meeting and to get hoping to raise his religion and social status. He took a simple journey in the forest and it turned into a complicated ending. He met up with a traveler who was waiting for him in the woods. They were walking on a narrow path but it was hard to stay on because of the distraction and they ended up on a wide path. In the Bible it says 'a narrow path leads to heaven, and a wide path leads to hell.'; This was not a simple journey for Young Goodman Brown as a young man because he must have pure thoughts about anything. Strange things began to happen on his journey.

The Armenian Genocide

â€Å"The Armenian Genocide† In 1948, the United Nations adopted the Genocide Convention, and in doing so defined the term â€Å"genocide† as â€Å"acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole, or in part, a national, ethical, racial, or religious group† (Totten and Parsons 4). Indeed by many scholars, this is thought to be the case as to what happened to the Armenian population within the Ottoman Empire in 1915. Rouben Paul Adalian, author of the critical essay â€Å"The Armenian Genocide† published within the book Century of Genocide: Critical Essays and Eyewitness Accounts edited by Samuel Totten and William S.Parsons, claims this belief to be true. In his essay, Adalian describes what life was like before 1915, reasons why the genocide happened, how the genocide was committed, and the impact the genocide left on society. Before 1915 the Armenian people had lived freely in the region of Asia Minor for around 3000 years. However, around the 11th c entury Turkish tribes invaded the Armenians and took over the area while settling down permanently there.Because the Ottoman Empire eventually expanded their territory to Eastern Europe, Western Asia, and North Africa, they needed an improved political system in order to govern everyone effectively (Adalian 55). As a result, Adalian notes that the Ottomans â€Å"imposed a strictly hierarchical social system that subordinated non-Muslims as second-class subjects deprived of basic rights† (55). In spite of the Armenians being deemed second-class citizens socially, they were actually a middle-class group economically, leaving jealousy amongst the Muslims.Even though life for Armenians was serviceable, it would soon take a turn for the worst. There are a few reasons as to why the Armenian genocide became certain by 1915. The first reason was because of the decline of power in the Ottoman government. Because the Armenians could see that the government could not guarantee the prote ction of their property and life, the Armenians looked for reform (59). As a result, this created an increased feeling of hostility and stubbornness between the two.The second reason was because of the military weakness of the Ottoman Empire. According to Adalian, the military was â€Å"prone to resorting to brutality as a method of containing domestic dissent, especially with disaffected non-Muslim minorities† (60). The third and most important reason is because of the formation of the political organization known as the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP). The party originally advocated for constitutionalism, egalitarianism, and liberalism, but when the party overthrew the government in 1913 everything changed.Radicals within the party were able to gain control and they were influenced by their German ally, leading to the promotion of turkification which was vehemently opposed by the Armenians (61). Shortly after the CUP gained power, they opted to invade Russia in order to gain more land. After the attempted invasion by the Ottoman Empire, they were quickly destroyed by the Russians and ended up losing territory. Because the CUP refused to accept responsibility of the embarrassing defeat, they used the Armenians as a scapegoat.Adalian goes on to say, â€Å"the Young Turks placed the blame on the Armenians by accusing them of collaboration with the enemy. Charging the entire Armenian population with treason and sedition† (62). The genocide officially began on April 24, 1915 and the abuse that the Armenians took while being deported was horrendous. The genocide of the Armenians was a plan carefully devised into three parts: deportation, execution, and starvation. Intellectuals and scholars of Armenian communities were abducted overnight on April 24 to ensure that the plan would go smoothly and reduce the amount of resistance.Soon after, women and children were ordered by the Ottoman government to leave town in the direction of the Syrian Deser t. Most Armenians went by foot and were extremely unprepared for the length of the journey. According to Adalian, â€Å"Only a quarter of all deportees survived the hundreds of miles and weeks of walking. Exhaustion, exposure, and fright took a heavy toll especially on the old and young† (58). This happened because the government purposely refused to give food and water to the Armenians.However, some were able to escape from the convoys of deportees when they stopped at other towns. Also, the government created a special organization made up entirely of convicts whose sole purpose was to rob, kidnap, and murder Armenians along the way. The absence of men in the deportation process was because the Ottoman Government had summoned them ahead of time in which they were imprisoned and tortured (58). The amount of desperation within the Armenians began to grow, â€Å"Men and women dying of thirst were shot for approaching the Euphrates River.Women were stripped naked, abused, and murdered. Others despairing of their fate threw themselves into the river and drowned† said Adalian (59). When the Armenians reached their destination of Deir el-Zor, the remaining survivors were murdered in cold blood. In all, around 1 million Armenians were killed during the deportation, scarring them for years to come. The genocide left a tremendous impact on the Armenian people. Whole communities were destroyed, leaving many in need of food, clothing, and housing (71).Also, there was incredible trauma placed on the Armenians, and they had to face the fact that they were most likely not going to be compensated for everything they had lost. Even when the few survivors returned back to their homes, they were unwelcomed and forced to leave. Possibly the greatest impact the genocide had induced, was the fact that for the first time in over 3000 years, the Armenians no longer lived in their homeland (71). There is still resentment today between the Armenians and Turks mainly bec ause the Turkish government refuses to acknowledge that the genocide ever occurred.Adalian concludes, â€Å"The experience of the Armenian people in the period after the genocide teaches another important lesson. Unless the consequences of genocide are addressed in the immediate aftermath of the event, the element of time very soon puts survivors at a serious disadvantage. Without the attention of the international community, without the intervention of major states seeking to stabilize the affected region, without the swift apprehension of the guilty, and without the full exposure of the evidence, the victims stand no chance of recovering from their losses.In the absence of a response and of universal condemnation, a genocide becomes ‘legitimized’† (77). Works Cited Adailian, Rouben Paul. â€Å"The Armenian Genocide†. Century of Genocide: Critical Essays and Eye Witness Accounts. Ed. Samuel Totten and William Parsons. 3rd ed. New York Routledge, 2009. 55- 92. Print. Totten, Samuel, and William S. Parsons. â€Å"Introductions†. Century of Genocide: Critical Essays and Eye Witness Accounts. Ed. Samuel Totten and William Parsons. 3rd ed. New York Routledge, 2009. 1-14. Print.

The Concept Of Separate Spheres Essay - 1408 Words

The concept of ‘Separate Spheres’ is a framework used by historians to describe the way in which men were associated with the public sphere, belonging outside of the home in areas such as business and politics, whereas women belonged in the private sphere, doing domestic duties within the home. The ‘Separate Spheres’ framework has become one of the most important ways of categorising gender history in the period from 1685 to 1870, although it is not without difficulties. Despite these difficulties, the concept of ‘Separate Spheres’ is a useful framework to understand the lives of men and women in the period from 1685 to 1870, as long as it is not limited to one section of society, it is used loosely to describe gender ideals as well as the lives of individual men and women, and public and private are defined clearly. To understand how using the concept of ‘Separate Spheres’ is useful, it is important to understand what it refers to. The concept of ‘Separate Spheres’ can be seen clearly in artistic representations of women and men from the period, for example in George Elgar Hick’s collection of three paintings called ‘The Woman’s Mission’. In the first instalment, ‘Guide of Childhood’ a women is displayed as a mother, leading her child through a garden, steering them away from danger. The second, ‘Companion of Manhood’ shows the same woman, comforting her grieving husband. The third and final piece ‘Comfort of Old Age’ shows the woman caring for her elderly father. TheseShow MoreRelatedThe Public And Private Sphere1387 Words   |  6 PagesThe understanding of the public and private spheres has been part of a number of debates in different areas of academia, particularly in political theory and internatio nal relations. The concept of civil society emerges from this debate in an attempt to understand the formations of people outside of the private sphere. In this sense, I want to explore the development and expansion of this concept. In order to do that, I will explore the contributions of Jà ¼rgen Habermas and Nancy Fraser to the conceptualizationRead MoreEssay on Secularization588 Words   |  3 PagesSecularization as a concept refers to the actual historical process whereby this dualist system #8220; this world; and the sacramental structures of mediation between this world and the other world progressively breakdown until the entire medieval systems of classification disappear, to be replaced by new systems of spatial structuration of the spheres. The structured division of this world; into two separate spheres, the religious; and the secular; has to be distinguished and kept separate. From nowRead MoreHow far do the sources agree that the philosophy of separate spheres impli ed that women were inferior to men?1041 Words   |  5 Pagesthem in separate spheres. What makes the difference bigger and more significant was that women werent educated unlike males and their manners were vastly different. From the source it says, They are designed to move in separate spheres but occasionally to unite together, in order to soften each other. This is suggesting that God wanted men and women to be different and have almost no interaction when at work and just away in general from the house. Theyre placed in two separate spheres and areRead MoreGender Differences throughout History Essay examples856 Words   |  4 Pagesone is an ontologist, exploring the metaphysical nature of gender differences (that may or may not lead down the road of essentialism) or a phenomenologist exploring how exactly it is that one â€Å"does† gender—to the extent that there even exists a concept called gender—one must employ a varied and multipartite approach. Writ ers such as Federici, Mies, and Davis sketched out a framework of the history of gender roles for us. From what Federici calls a time of primitive consumption through feudalismRead MoreSusan T. Foh s The Christian Faith865 Words   |  4 Pagesvaluable dissimilarities of men and women. Susan T. Foh, a Christian author, has redefined the concept of complementarity in her own terms, coining the phrase ontologically equal, but functionally subordinate (Foh, 391). Her interpretation also comes directly from Biblical sources, but the meaning behind her careful phrasing does present some disparities between the two concepts. As stated above, both concepts are drawn from Biblical sources, utilizing both the Old and New Testaments in order to provideRead More Jane Addams and the Progressive Movement Essay1388 Words   |  6 Pagessettlement house, Addams redefined the idea of ?separate spheres,? and with relentless determination, she separated herself from the domestic chores that woman were confined to during the later half of the nineteenth century which led to the twentieth one. During the late nineteenth century, the notion of ?separate spheres? dictated that the women?s world was limited to the home, taking care of domestic concerns. Women were considered to be in the private sphere of society. Men on the other hand wereRead MoreEssay On Fast Ignition1202 Words   |  5 Pagesremoved HTML --) In this approach, the ignition is triggered by heating the compressed fuel with a â€Å"fast† (∠¼MeV) electron beam, which is generated by a separate ultra-intense laser (UIL) either in a cone-in-shell concept (-- removed HTML --) (-- removed HTML --) 3,4 (-- removed HTML --) (-- removed HTML --) or in a super-penetration concept. (-- removed HTML --) (-- removed HTML --) 5,6 (-- removed HTML --) (-- removed HTML --) A high-density fuel core plays a key role in this approach, becauseRead More Thomas Jefferson Essay1340 Words   |  6 PagesThe ideology of separate spheres dominated thoughts about â€Å"proper† gender roles from the late 18th century through the 19th century in America. Ideology of separate spheres is a concept impact on gender equation by the segregation of the two spheres of life: the private and the public. In the conception of the division of gender roles into separate spheres, women’s place was in the private sphere, such as family life and the home (Hollitz, 238). Men’s place was in the public sphere, such as in politicsRead MoreGender, Class And Urban Space : Public And Private Space1586 Words   |  7 Pagesperspectives about the possible interconnections between gender dichotomy ,urban public /private space or city/suburb dichotomies and how separable or intertwined they are with each other. She attempts to further provide evidence that ‘the ideal of separate spheres’ (Bondi, Pg.162.) continues to affect our lives .She states that gentrification and class is intertwined in this dynamic interaction between gender and space. Bondi identifies these ‘dichotomies ’ as duos, be it city/suburb, public /private orRead MoreA Review of Nancy Fasers Rethinking the Public Sphere1007 Words   |  5 PagesPriyanca Vaishnav, Satish Poduval, Media and the Public Domain 13th February 2007 Report: Rethinking The Public Sphere by Nancy Fraser Rethinking The Public Sphere is a response to Habermas 1973 essay, later published in English as The Public Sphere in 1989. Habermas states his concept of the public sphere as both historical, and normative. It is historical both in the sense of era and region- 20th century Western Europe. He dismantles the distinctions between the public and private